According to the Danish newspaper Politiken, a video game called “Eden,” which is based on the film, is in the works. It will start where the film ends. “It will be a self-therapeutic journey into your own darkest fears, and will break the boundaries of what you can and can’t do in video games,” says video game director Morten Iversen.
A really handy guide. Had it up and running on my network drive in minutes.
“I had a conversation with a very smart guy at Foocamp about two months ago. He made a statement that I’m starting to almost 100% agree with…”If those who are currently making decisions will either be dead or retired in 10 years and won’t truly feel the effects of their decisions, they shouldn’t be allowed to make those decision.”
The internet is the greatest generation gap since rock-n-roll. They’ll just never understand.
”
jay parkinson + md + mph = doctor in brooklyn
Ok, I get why tumblr likes this: it’s a pro internet comment that undermines the people older than those tumblring who actually make decisions. But I ask you this:
What internet-centric person has been at a company longer than 10 years? Five years?
Exactly.
(via alwayscapitalize)
From his introduction to Myth and Meaning:
I never had, and still do not have, the perception of feeling my personal identity. I appear to myself as the place where something is going on, but there is no ‘I’, no ‘me.’ Each of us is a kind of crossroads where things happen. The crossroads is purely passive; something happens elsewhere. There is no choice, it is just a matter of chance.
I don’t pretend at all that, because I think that way, I am entitled to conclude that mankind thinks that way too. But I believe that, for each scholar and each writer, the particular way he or she thinks and writes opens a new outlook on mankind. And the fact that I personally have this idiosyncrasy perhaps entitles me to point to something which is valid, while the way in which my colleagues think opens different outlooks, all of which are equally valid.
I’ve always been intrigued by that passage as it’s written by the man who invented structuralism. Written ahead of his ordered thoughts, it acknowledges the situated knowledge movement that would come into anthropology (especially at Santa Cruz) while allowing room for him to make sweeping statements. After all, he saw the world as himself. Lévi-Strauss was certainly pragmatic.
Apple switches from their Windows CE mobile terminals to a souped up iPod Touch, complete with a bar code scanner, card reader, and battery pack.
I’m still surprised more retail establishments haven’t adopted the mobile terminal idea. It’s dangerously easy to buy something from anywhere in the store at Apple. (Via Gizmodo)
I always pour over Agency Spy posts regarding planners. Not for the articles, but for the inevitable comments. Posters are always angry, frustrated, and fed-up with the planners at their shops. A sampling:
I’ve never met a planner that brought any true insights to the table. Mostly they regurgitate research. Or even better, tell you what you already knew, eating up time that could be spent thinking.
And:
It usually takes a planner or a group of planners three months to write a brief. They have minimal input as the client over rules them on every point, because they have little knowledge of branding.
Then they stick it in front of a real creative and read it word for word like they are presenting.
And:
Planners were once called research. Planners were once called media. Planners were once called insight. Planner were once called engagement. Planners were once called innovative. Planners were once again called planners.
I call them overpaid.
In my experience as a planner the above comments are all valid.
Planners often get lost in the thought-process and ignore the processes that exist outside them. They step on toes by assuming that they monopolize the “smarts” in the agency, ignoring the strategic abilities of creatives and the contextual knowledge of account people.
The best planners I’ve worked with understand that the role of planners is to make everyone else at the agency better. Everything they do should inspire creatives, arm account people with insights and knowledge, and help media planners be more relevant and efficient. That’s it.
Alain Sylvain’s suggestion in this post that a planner’s job is to, “bring smarts into the mix,” seems designed to anger everyone who’s worked with him.
In fact, most of the conferences and summits planners hold (the original subject of the linked Agency Spy post) don’t help their reputation with creatives. PSFK’s SPUR illustrates this perfectly: the summit is composed entirely of planners! For a job where you you almost solely work with other positions, navel gazing with a group of your own is pointless and compounds the perception problem.
I bought a tape last night for $3, from the band that opened for Big Business. Fittingly, they sounded like 1993, despite their drummer’s skills. Nothing special.
But I figured this was probably the last time I would ever have the opportunity to buy a tape outside of a gas station in the middle of nowhere.
What’s Gawker.TV? - The Business Insider
Photo by the amazing Diana Levine.
Congratulations Blakeley, looking forward to it.